← Search

Karen Casavant

— year-end
45 matches · 21W–24L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Karen Casavant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-05-16 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Junying Lei
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Duethman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Junying Lei
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-24 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-03 · IA/Bradley-Heffernan/40&Over3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · IA/Bradley-Heffernan/40&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Norris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-11 · IA/Bradley-Heffernan/40&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Milavetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-04-26 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Milavetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-11-23 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Betts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams23 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 29.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal