← Search

Carolyn Carbone

Tucson, AZ
3.0M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
55 matches · 21W–34L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Carolyn Carbone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2025-08-04 · SAZ/Cunningham/18 & Over Mixed/7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-28 · SAZ/Cunningham/18 & Over Mixed/7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Schuessler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-07 · SAZ/Cunningham/18 & Over Mixed/7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Beckett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-23 · SAZ/Cunningham/18 & Over Mixed/7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aidan Avery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-05-26 · SAZ/Cunningham/18 & Over Mixed/7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nathan Carey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2022-07-20 · Mixed Emotions · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Lodge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-06 · Mixed Emotions · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Stuckey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-11 · Mixed Emotions · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Stuckey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-04 · Reffkin/4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vedah Halberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-21 · Reffkin/4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vedah Halberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-14 · Reffkin/4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Kilpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-04-30 · Reffkin/4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vedah Halberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
8W–8L · 49.7% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 35.4% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.4% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.9% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#1 Singles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams