← Search

Geoff Fuller

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 22W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Geoff Fuller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Ma.Vaughn40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ben Micham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Ma.Vaughn40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Kaulback
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-20 · Ma.Vaughn40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charles Ashby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · Ca.Zimmerman55M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-22 · Ca.Zimmerman55M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Ca.Zimmerman55M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-09-12 · Br.McLean40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-09-05 · Br.McLean40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kevin Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Donald Stillwell / Kenneth Lesher
2024-08-22 · Br.McLean40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-05 · Jo.Gouveia18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian McLean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-07-17 · Br.McLean18S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-27 · La.Holderness40M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
56%
14W–11L · 50.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 57% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 32.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#2 Singles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer