← Search

Bonnie Paquin

Argyle, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 5W–6L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Bonnie Paquin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2026-09-11 · LTF CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-1
W
2026-03-27 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Steele Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-13 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth WeinmannLopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-01-09 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Pruner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-10-22 · RTC CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Priscila Vidal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
Alissa McKinney / Nicole Taylor
2025-10-10 · RTC CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Pine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-03-05 · RTC CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Priscila Vidal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-31 · BIR CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Pine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-10-25 · BIR CURTIS/PRUNER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Pine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Jennifer Matthews / Cindy Pappous
2024-10-11 · BIR CURTIS/PRUNER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-09-27 · BIR CURTIS/PRUNER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova