← Search

Ruth WeinmannLopez

— year-end
19 matches · 10W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ruth WeinmannLopez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-03-21 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaylea Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-27 · RTC CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with REBECCA BONEAU
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-13 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Paquin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-02-09 · BIR PINE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Cauwels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-01-16 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Stokes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-10 · BIR HENDERSON/CURLEY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-03 · BIR HENDERSON/CURLEY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-19 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-13 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Steele Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-11 · BIR HENDERSON/CURLEY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-4
W
2025-04-08 · BIR HENDERSON/CURLEY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-02-28 · BIR HENDERSON/CURLEY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
50%
9W–9L · 48.8% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King