← Search

Tiffany Mckelvey

— year-end
67 matches · 49W–18L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Tiffany Mckelvey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-09-12 · RC PALKO · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary-Alex Thacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-11 · RC PALKO · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Sheppard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · RC KRIPPEL · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Castaneda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · RC KRIPPEL · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Biggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-25 · Albus/Tebeaux · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-24 · Albus/Tebeaux · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-23 · Albus/Tebeaux · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · TCU MILAM/MILNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Briana Stierwalt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-03 · CCC GRALAPP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy McLawhorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-03-27 · CCC GRALAPP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley McClure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-23 · CCC GRALAPP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Sheppard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-13 · TCU MILAM/MILNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Margeson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams21 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.5% of games
3.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 69% of games
3.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 56.1% of games
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 61.1% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#1 Singles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer