← Search

Deborah Brill

Pittsburgh, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 73W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Brill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Glen Creek · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with JeanLouise Hornberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Britt Eubanks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · PTA · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Emily Pallaki / Emma Pickering
2026-07-19 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Janelle Kotyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · Glen Creek · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with JeanLouise Hornberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-11 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eleni Dedousis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Glen Creek · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Britt Eubanks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · PTA · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Chi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Glen Creek · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-04-26 · Glen Creek · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-01-31 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Flinner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 35.6% of games
4.0
68.4%
39W–18L · 59.6% of games
4.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.8% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
31%
13W–29L · 44.4% of games
9.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
52 matches
#1 Singles
30%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova