← Search

Janelle Kotyk

Pittsburgh, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 126W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janelle Kotyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Glen Creek · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Britt Eubanks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
Emily Pallaki / Emma Pickering
2026-07-19 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eleni Dedousis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-11 · Highland Park · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith Waltenbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Emily Pallaki / Emma Pickering
2026-06-14 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · Highland Park · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · Glen Creek · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chelsea Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-2
L
2026-03-15 · 40 AF · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Paat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-08 · 40 AF · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bryan Corder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-07 · 40 AF · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Hay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 4-2
L
2026-01-23 · 40 AF · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Paat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
Emily Pallaki / Avik Agrawal
2025-11-23 · The Other Guys · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eric Elek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.8% of games
3.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 71.1% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 55.1% of games
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 61.3% of games
4.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 49.7% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 75.4% of games
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.5% of games
7.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 70.4% of games
7.5mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 66.4% of games
8.0mixed
93.8%
30W–2L · 63.3% of games
8.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 72.3% of games
9.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King