← Search

Andrea Heffernan

Iowa City, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 63W–40L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Andrea Heffernan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-07-29 · DiLeo · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl VandeVoorde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-08 · DiLeo · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl VandeVoorde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · DiLeo · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl VandeVoorde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · DiLeo · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cathy Dmello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · Yawalkar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sachin Yawalkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Yawalkar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sachin Yawalkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Ann Brown / Faye Williams
2026-04-25 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Malott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-12 · Ross · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Drew Pierson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Ross · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-02-22 · Yawalkar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sachin Yawalkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.1% of games
3.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 65.6% of games
4.0
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
31 matches
#1 Singles
27%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King