← Search

Faye Williams

Monticello, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 35W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Faye Williams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-05-09 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-18 · Cobb & Trovas: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-17 · Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Randall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Becky Flander / Rebecca Studer
2026-04-12 · Hurn/Sherman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Dmello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caren Wasta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-04 · Cobb & Trovas: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Netolicky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-29 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · Brown: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Dmello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-08 · Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Randall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60% of games
4.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 46.5% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 51% of games
8.0
25%
6W–18L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#2 Singles
10%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal