← Search

Chih-Wei Chen

Fresh Meadows, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
279 matches · 174W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chih-Wei Chen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history279 matches
W
2026-08-18 · Carefree, Wei Chen/Aviles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mi Hwa Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nerissa Lem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · Carefree, Aviles/Barry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mi Hwa Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-22 · Brooklyn: Bernstein · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Rodeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with He Qing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · Carefree, Aviles/Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ya Qian Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · Brooklyn: Bernstein · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-06-28 · Maselbas/Chen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kirschenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · Maselbas/Chen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annabelle Rosenzweig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · Carefree, Aviles/Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.8% of games
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 67.9% of games
3.5
61.3%
76W–48L · 54.4% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.8% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 65.5% of games
7.0
60%
18W–12L · 57.4% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.3%
19W–12L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
106 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
81 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer