← Search

Elayna Rathmann

Larkspur, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 79W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elayna Rathmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-07-13 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Mast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-28 · FLYHS RATHMANN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marc Rathmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-06-22 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Creps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · FLYHS RATHMANN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marc Rathmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Kristi Creps championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Mast championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-05 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with CLAUDIA GRAVER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with CLAUDIA GRAVER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-01 · FLYHS SAXBY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · FLYHS RATHMANN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marc Rathmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-18 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Creps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 55.3% of games
4.0
48.8%
39W–41L · 47.6% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.2% of games
6.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
27.7%
13W–34L · 41.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
30 matches
#2 Singles
12%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer