← Search

Kristi Creps

Colorado Springs, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 61W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristi Creps to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-08-31 · FLYHS SAXBY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Jewett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · FLYHS SAXBY · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diogo Carvalho mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-03 · FLYHS SAXBY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsey Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Bryant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Hickerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · FLYHS SAXBY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsey Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
Phil Abello / Rachel Rocks
2026-07-19 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Bryant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · FLYHS SAXBY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsey Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · FLYHS SAXBY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsey Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-22 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elayna Rathmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Chelsey Wright championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Elayna Rathmann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games
4.0
63.3%
38W–22L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 38.4% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 39.5% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams