← Search

Claudia Goddard

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 68W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Claudia Goddard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-08-31 · MEMPK JOHNSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · MEMPK JOHNSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly McLaurin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · MEMPK JOHNSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly McLaurin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · CSRC MCCOLLETT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Lehrer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · MEMPK LOWERY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Scheper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · CSRC MCCOLLETT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Lehrer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · MEMPK LOWERY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Scheper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · MEMPK JOHNSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayla Breedlove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · MEMPK LOWERY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly McLaurin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · CSRC MACLIZ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew McPherson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · MEMPK JOHNSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-05 · CSRC MACLIZ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew McPherson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 67.5% of games
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 59.2% of games
4.0
36%
9W–16L · 43.9% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 46.1% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert