← Search

David Trevino

Fort Collins, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 40W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Trevino to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-09-01 · MLF MAROON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Metzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · MLF MAROON · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Royce Grover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · MLF MAROON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-12 · MLF RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Trevino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · MLF RED · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Trevino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-12 · MLF RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Trevino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · MLF PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Ashbee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Daigle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · MLF PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Arnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · MLF RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · MLF ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Ashbee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-22 · MLF RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chet Reistad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.1% of games
4.0
53.7%
22W–19L · 52.5% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer