← Search

Natasha Uecker

DENVER, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 115W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Natasha Uecker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
W
2026-09-03 · NJ BLACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Howe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · NJ BLACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Howe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · NJ BLACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Howe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-14 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Huynh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
Carole Lofing / Amy Long
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Marlene Swartz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
Sarah Turner / Jason Abrams
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Gary Civitella championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Meng Lian championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlene Swartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlene Swartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jarret Sutphin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-05 · NJ GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Huynh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-05 · Colorado/Stiebeling/MX40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meng Lian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
67.2%
45W–22L · 56.6% of games
4.0
36.2%
21W–37L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 66.8% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
46 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova