← Search

Marlene Swartz

Arvada, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 74W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marlene Swartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-09-03 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Poulsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Lynn Adams / Brooke Babington
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Pamela Johnstone championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Carrie Poulsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Leah Vladika championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · NJ BLACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Mobley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
Carole Lofing / Amy Long
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Natasha Uecker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · NJ BLACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Johnstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-23 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Uecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Uecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Pamela Johnstone championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Poulsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Eng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56.2%
50W–39L · 53.6% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.2% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 64.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#1 Singles
10%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams