← Search

Julie Faber

Grand Junction, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 85W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Faber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-08-31 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Faber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · GJTC JFABER · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Creed Clayton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-06 · GJTC JFABER · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Creed Clayton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
Catherine Lewis / Haley Freeborn
2026-08-04 · GJTC CMcGUIRE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · GJTC CMcGUIRE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Kelly Saalwachter / Haley Freeborn
2026-06-30 · GJTC CMcGUIRE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Annette James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Faber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-27 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Ausband
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-20 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-13 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
85.7%
24W–4L · 66% of games
4.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.1% of games
8.5mixed
72.5%
29W–11L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
24 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe