← Search

Catherine Lewis

Grand Junction, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 30W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Catherine Lewis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-08-31 · GJTC CRIISE · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-3
W
2026-08-17 · GJTC CRIISE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenna Berguin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-3
W
2026-08-04 · GJTC JAUBERT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Freeborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · GJTC CRIISE · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · GJTC JAUBERT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Klara Sprojcarova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Jennifer Otto
2025-12-16 · Harrell, Kimberly · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-12-07 · Harrell, Kimberly · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Jayme Griffin
2025-11-13 · Harrell, Kimberly · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
MacKenzie Carmody / Anna Fiser
2025-10-20 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with MAYRA PRADO CONTRERAS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-10-15 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacie Rector
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-14 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with MAYRA PRADO CONTRERAS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Mary Taylor / Cindy Page
2025-10-06 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelli Ferrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 34.7% of games
4.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.4% of games
4.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.6% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.6% of games
9.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 74.1% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King