← Search

Denise Faber

Fruita, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 111W–100L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise Faber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
W
2026-08-31 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Faber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-10 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Saalwachter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Randy Hurshman / Haley Freeborn
2026-08-06 · GJTC JFABER · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Alano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-04 · GJTC CMcGUIRE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · GJTC KSAALWACHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordyn Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · GJTC JFABER · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Alano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · CROWN GOLD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denison Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · CROWN GOLD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paula Ponto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · CROWN GOLD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Zeigel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Renee Gerrick / Sharon Sturges
2026-07-24 · CROWN GOLD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paula Ponto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · GJTC CMcGUIRE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · GJTC CMcGUIRE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Sharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63.6%
56W–32L · 55.9% of games
4.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 45.6% of games
8.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 49.9% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.5% of games
8.5mixed
43.3%
13W–17L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#1 Singles
6%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer