← Search

Dianne Sandy

Littleton, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 123W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dianne Sandy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history190 matches
W
2026-08-16 · KC-CC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Sandy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Sandy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · KC-RH PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Sandy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · KC-RH PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Gregg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · KC-CC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Rachwalski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · KC-RH PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · KC-CC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · KC-RH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
78.8%
63W–17L · 61.3% of games
4.0
43.8%
21W–27L · 49.2% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 63.8% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 59% of games
7.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams