← Search

Anne Fox

Littleton, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 103W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Fox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-08-06 · KC-RH PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Pike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · KC-RH PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · KC-CC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lana Banbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-02 · KC-RH PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · KC-CC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · KC-RH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · KC-RH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-09 · KC-CC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · KC-RH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.3%
69W–35L · 57.1% of games
4.0
47.9%
23W–25L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.6% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
39 matches
#1 Singles
18%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams