← Search

Monica Greenfield

Centennial, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 74W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Monica Greenfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-07-30 · HG PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · HG PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Millet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-30 · KC-RH YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candice Saxon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · HG PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Devin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · KC-RH YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fernanda Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-18 · HG RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Regis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · KC-RH YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Willoughby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · HG RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Devin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · HG RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Millet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · KC-RH RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candice Saxon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · HG RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Devin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · KC-RH RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Willoughby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.9% of games
3.5
58.5%
38W–27L · 54% of games
4.0
38.3%
31W–50L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams