← Search

Jenni Price

North Salt Lake, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 116W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jenni Price to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Eagleridge-Mower/Price · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Eagleridge-Mower/Price · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Halls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Eagleridge-Mower/Price · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Mower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-26 · Eagleridge-Mower/Price · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Beames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · Eagleridge-Mower/Price · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · Eagleridge-Mower · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Cahoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-30 · Eagleridge-Mower · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Halls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · Eagleridge-Mower · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-12 · Eagleridge-Mower · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Mower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-26 · Eagleridge-Mower · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-12 · Eagleridge-Mower · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Metcalf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-05 · Eagleridge-Mower · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 68.5% of games
3.0
68.4%
26W–12L · 59.6% of games
3.5
71%
44W–18L · 55.9% of games
4.0
44.3%
27W–34L · 49.3% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.7% of games
6.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert