← Search

Kim Steffen

Columbia, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 116W–97L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kim Steffen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Dempsey - #1 Combo with fries · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-11 · Tetrault - Mahj and Volley · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-10 · Chung - Dynamic Duos · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with GENA CHUNG
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-03 · Dempsey - #1 Combo with fries · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · Chung - Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wenxi Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · Dempsey - #1 Combo with fries · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5
W
2026-08-08 · Dempsey - #1 Combo with fries · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sanghee Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Chung - Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wenxi Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-31 · Baker 40+4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Chung - Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · Chung - Alley Cats · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zheng Dong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · Baker 40+4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Schetgen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
65.4%
53W–28L · 57.6% of games
4.0
47.4%
37W–41L · 49.7% of games
7.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 32.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer