← Search

Gena Burr

Chester, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 116W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gena Burr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Belmont Moseley · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Dell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Moehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Belmont Moseley · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eunice Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-11 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tia Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tia Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Moehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-1
L
2026-07-21 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Moehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Moehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Moehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · WO Haas Weekend 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maya Wilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · WO Haas Weekend 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Vetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · WO Haas Weekend 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maya Wilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70.5%
62W–26L · 57.5% of games
4.5
41.2%
14W–20L · 45.2% of games
7.5
100%
11W–0L · 66.5% of games
8.5
50%
8W–8L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.7% of games
7.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 35.5% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#3 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova