← Search

Cindy Birnbaum

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
363 matches · 205W–158L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Birnbaum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history363 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Woodlake Poindexter/Estes 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-09 · Woodlake Cooksey · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blanka White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-08 · Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noelle Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-06 · Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-05 · Woodlake Poindexter/Estes 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dana Fath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Fath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · Woodlake Cooksey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Beth Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peggy McElgunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Cooksey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-31 · Woodlake Phelps · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Woodlake Poindexter/Estes 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Hannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
65.5%
129W–68L · 55.7% of games
4.0
42.5%
17W–23L · 47% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.3% of games
7.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 49.4% of games
7.5
56.1%
23W–18L · 51.4% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.4% of games
7.5mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
92 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
56 matches
#2 Singles
8%
29 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova