← Search

Jagannath Surampudi

Clarksville, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
626 matches · 296W–330L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jagannath Surampudi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history626 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Reger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Florin Iancu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Reger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Kevin Rothstein / Brian Smith
2026-07-13 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Adson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-08 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anirudh Sridharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ira Daar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · Foehrkolb 40+3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Roll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Arterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Adson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-10 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Rawlings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · ZHANG - Tenbots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Guo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams132 teams · 2020–2026
AP-Brad Intentions
2026 Frederick Combo · Frederick Combo 7.5 Men
2026
Advantage Hill 18+ 3.5
2026 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men · 18+
2026
B Jacques - BradCakes3.5-4.5Tri
2026 Frederick Tri-Level Men · Frederick Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men
2026
Brandt
2026 Howard Mixed 18 & Over · Howard Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 · 18+
2026
Foehrkolb 18+ 3.5
2026 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men · 18+
2026
Foehrkolb 40+3.5
2026 Baltimore Adult 40 & Over · Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men · 40+
2026
Ghim - Steely Vanguard
2026 Howard Adult 18 & Over · Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men · 18+
2026
Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+
2026 Howard Adult 40 & Over · Howard Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men · 40+
2026
Kozliak - Ivan Mixed 18+ 7.0
2026 Frederick Mixed 18 & Over · Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 · 18+
2026
Over the Hill 40+3.5
2026 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men · 40+
2026
Racq Pack
2026 Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men · 18+
2026
Rian40+4.0
2026 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men · 40+
2026
RianJacquesTri3.0-4.0
2026 Frederick Tri-Level Men · Frederick Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men
2026
Team 12 Net-Dominators
2026 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men · 18+
2026
ZHANG - Tenbots
2026 Howard Adult 18 & Over · Howard Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men · 18+
2026
Zhang - Les Ballers
2026 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men
2026
Zhang - Les Ballers
2026 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men · 18+
2026
Zhang - Tenbots
2026 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over · Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men · 40+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 44.3% of games
3.5
61.9%
130W–80L · 54% of games
4.0
23.6%
29W–94L · 39.6% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.5% of games
7.5
39.6%
19W–29L · 47.1% of games
0.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 45.6% of games
3.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 41.1% of games
6.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 54.2% of games
6.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
56.6%
56W–43L · 53.1% of games
7.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
246 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
204 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
146 matches
#2 Singles
2%
10 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert