← Search

Stephen Rawlings

— year-end
179 matches · 47W–132L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Stephen Rawlings to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
W
2026-06-24 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Forbes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jagannath Surampudi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Firestone - Firemen '26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Knolmayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-26 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vincent Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · Firestone - Firemen '26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Srihari Vemulakonda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-16 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vincent Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · Firestone - Firemen '26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrey Savtchenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-06 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Qiming He
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-31 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yu-ping Su
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-16 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Ferrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-06 · Zhang - Les Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Lynk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-01 · McKeon - Defenders · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tom Oda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Teams70 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
22.2%
12W–42L · 39.7% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.2% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 34.3% of games
7.0
34.3%
12W–23L · 42.1% of games
7.5
16%
4W–21L · 35.2% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
28.9%
11W–27L · 39.1% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 29.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
34 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer