← Search

Bala Ramadoss

Apex, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 57W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bala Ramadoss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
L
2026-09-02 · TOC.Mehra · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Krishna Alijala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · TOC.Mehra · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karan Mehra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · TOC.Mehra · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Balaji Radhakrishnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · TOC.Raghav · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karan Mehra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · TOC.Raghav · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Balaji Radhakrishnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · ANP.Pasangulapati · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · TOC.Raghav · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karan Mehra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
John Park / David Stanton
2026-07-02 · TOC.Raghav · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karan Mehra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · TOC.Raghav · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Balaji Radhakrishnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · ANP.Pasangulapati · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · TOC.Raghav · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Balaji Radhakrishnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · TOC.Spining · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Rohrbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
46.5%
46W–53L · 49.4% of games
4.5
0%
0W–10L · 30.4% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.5% of games
8.5
16.3%
7W–36L · 34.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
29 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#3 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal