← Search

David Stanton

CARY, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 11W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add David Stanton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-09-13 · MD.Riddick · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · MD.Riddick · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Todd Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · MD.Riddick · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chris Crumpler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elton TSAI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elton TSAI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-02 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Bostic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · MD.Riddick · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · MD.Riddick · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Wangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · MD.Riddick · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
37.9%
11W–18L · 43.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#1 Singles
19%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#2 Singles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal