← Search

Balaji Radhakrishnan

Apex, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 60W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Balaji Radhakrishnan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-09-02 · TOC.Kumar · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sushrut Bhowmik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · TOC.Kumar · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kapil Dukle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-01 · NPuri.40C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rajeev Tonde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · TOC.Gupta · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Jobling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · NPuri.40C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vijay Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · TOC.Gupta · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vijay Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Kumar · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bhushan Pendse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-19 · TOC.Raghav · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karan Mehra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Scott Anderson / Joseph Holsopple
2026-08-16 · TOC.Gupta · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vijay Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · TOC.Raghav · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karan Mehra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · NPuri.40C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vijay Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · ANP.Pasangulapati · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
66.7%
28W–14L · 57% of games
4.0
32.5%
13W–27L · 42.6% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
56%
14W–11L · 53.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#2 Singles
12%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert