← Search

Teresa Beebe

DRIGGS, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 103W–53L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Teresa Beebe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ranay Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Lynda Fennern / Linda Orchard
2026-07-29 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NICOLE SPENCE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NICOLE SPENCE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ranay Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Meikle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ranay Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-15 · Thompreemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Meikle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NICOLE SPENCE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Lynda Fennern / Miranda Hoover
2026-06-25 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NICOLE SPENCE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · Thompreemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with NICOLE SPENCE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Amie Belnap / Jennifer Miller
2026-05-28 · Thompreemann · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ranay Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-12 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ranay Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 44% of games
3.5
75%
33W–11L · 60.5% of games
4.0
48%
12W–13L · 47.1% of games
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.7% of games
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.1% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 58.2% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova