← Search

Elizabeth Hann

Beavercreek, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 122W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Hann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history225 matches
W
Hannah Latty / Muffy Herman
2026-08-23 · QRRC-Buerschen · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Shively
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · QRRC-Buerschen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Donna McClanahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · KTC-McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Lunilia Crespo / Hannah Latty
2026-06-20 · QRRC-Buerschen · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Traci Moorhead
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · KTC-McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with JACLYN STUBBS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · KTC-McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · KTC-McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · KTC-McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-06 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-22 · KTC-Buerschen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-31 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.7%
33W–13L · 60% of games
4.5
47.4%
45W–50L · 51.1% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.4% of games
8.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 51.9% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
36 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova