← Search

Joeri Klutsch

Pocatello, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
282 matches · 166W–116L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joeri Klutsch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history282 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Baseline* · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cami Ellis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Baseline* · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cami Ellis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · Baseline* · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cami Ellis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · Brake · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · Brake · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · Pocatello · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Arteaga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Brake · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Enoch Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · Pocatello · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Arteaga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Pocatello · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · Brake · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Pocatello · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · Pocatello · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 65.4% of games
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 68.1% of games
3.5
86.7%
39W–6L · 63.1% of games
4.0
56.6%
30W–23L · 50.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
80%
8W–2L · 64.6% of games
7.0mixed
51.1%
24W–23L · 51.1% of games
7.5mixed
56%
14W–11L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
32.3%
10W–21L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
71 matches
#1 Singles
10%
29 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova