← Search

Noah Wang

INKOM, ID
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 78W–52L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Noah Wang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Baked PotAces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Spicer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · Baked PotAces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Bitton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · Baked PotAces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Spicer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Andrew Kim
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Enoch Ward championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-21 · The Chancla · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · The Chancla · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Snell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-02-18 · I guess I will play! · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amber Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-02-07 · I guess I will play! · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amber Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-02-04 · I guess I will play! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amber Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-01-28 · I guess I will play! · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anita Gibson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 61% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.2%
26W–6L · 62.5% of games
4.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 38.5% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63.2% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.7% of games
8.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.2% of games
9.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova