← Search

Jinu Hwang

Cleveland, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 83W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jinu Hwang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-07-07 · A40 4.0M MV2 Smith · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Markel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · A40 4.0M MV2 Smith · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Mock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Markel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · X18 8.0 MV Sterkenburg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolann Sterkenburg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-17 · X18 8.0 MV Sterkenburg · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Zalba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-14 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Bole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · A40 4.0M MV2 Smith · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerald King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · X40 8.0 MV2 Zalba · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
Jason Otto / Todd Kolarik
2026-03-14 · Low Tri M MV Gau · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seth Vilensky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · X40 8.0 MV2 Zalba · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chipo Jolibois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.6% of games
4.0
63%
29W–17L · 53.4% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 29.4% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 53.5% of games
8.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 53.1% of games
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
12W–12L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
37 matches
#1 Singles
8%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova