← Search

Zelma Barnes

— year-end
36 matches · 19W–17L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Zelma Barnes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2022-06-23 · Smashgirls//OKC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lenice Cattley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-5
L
2022-06-21 · Smashgirls//OKC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hasselwander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-05-31 · Smashgirls//OKC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marti Troy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2022-04-19 · Smashgirls//OKC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with AMY BATES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Jessica Anderson / Sara Brown
2022-04-05 · Smashgirls//OKC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with AMY BATES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2021-10-25 · SMASH GIRLS//ECC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Hurley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Treca Baetz / Carol Johnson
2021-09-28 · SMASHGIRLS//Greens · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamra Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2021-09-27 · SMASH GIRLS//ECC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bethany Neighbors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2021-09-20 · SMASH GIRLS//ECC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Lepere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2021-09-14 · SMASHGIRLS//Greens · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with AMY BATES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2021-09-07 · SMASHGIRLS//Greens · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Reece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-06-15 · Smashgirls/Greens · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hasselwander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams6 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.9% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.1% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer