← Search

Mark van Leuven

Troy, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 104W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark van Leuven to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Hanley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Benjamin Paultre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajesh Padmanabhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Northern: Wolverines · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krishna Vasireddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-05 · Northern: Wolverines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kah Seng Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Brent Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Anthony Sericolo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Donghyeon Chang / Jason Hao
2026-06-24 · Northern: Wolverines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Paultre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Paultre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Northern: Wolverines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Paultre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · Northern: Wolverines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
65.8%
48W–25L · 54.6% of games
4.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
16%
27 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams