← Search

AUSTIN KIM

Spotswood, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 89W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add AUSTIN KIM to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Ketan Deshpande championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Boyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · Colts Crew · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Hironaka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harshavardhan Dharkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · Colts Crew · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Hironaka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rudolf van Mol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Susan Lee / Robert Fea
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Bautista mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · Matchpoint Mavericks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kumaravadivelu Vairakkannu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · On Point! · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-5
L
2026-03-08 · Matchpoint Mavericks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-07 · Mixed Up · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 46.8% of games
4.0
30%
12W–28L · 43.2% of games
7.0mixed
56.2%
41W–32L · 53.7% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
47.2%
25W–28L · 47.2% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
61 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer