← Search

Gareth Tasker

Collierville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 17W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Gareth Tasker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Gibbs/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Sappenfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Heard / Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Graham Heard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-16 · Heard/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-09 · Heard/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Stark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-28 · Heard/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Stukenborg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-19 · Heard/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Perry Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-09-28 · Heard/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Stukenborg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-04-13 · Heard/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Gleason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-30 · Heard/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corey Richter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-03-23 · Heard/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elliot Kiersky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-11-24 · Phillips/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Stark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2024-11-03 · Phillips/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Graham Heard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert