← Search

Jennifer Sigan

Memphis, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 43W–49L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Sigan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-06-21 · Raymond/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyle Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Denney/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lyndsay Gronostaj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Sagar Pathak / Temika Barber
2026-06-14 · Raymond/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colt Von Lanken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · Raymond/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-30 · Thompson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Irvine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · Nair/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deepa Nair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · Nair/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-21 · Thompson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne von Lanken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lisa Evans / Cheryl Body
2026-04-18 · Lunsford/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · Lunsford/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
62.8%
27W–16L · 52.6% of games
3.5
30.3%
10W–23L · 37.3% of games
6.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.5% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer