← Search

Debora J Miller

Fort Collins, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 67W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debora J Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-08-05 · LT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Melissa King / Edie LaFonte
2026-07-29 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Crespin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · LT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-0
L
2026-07-15 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-08 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-10 · LT PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celeste Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · LT PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Mullarkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · LT PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celeste Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-09-10 · #1 Doubles · with Jean Tonoli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Karen Johnson / Mary Gabiola
2025-07-23 · MLF BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Crespin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-07-16 · MLF BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adrienne LeBailly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
62.5%
30W–18L · 53.6% of games
7.0
66%
35W–18L · 58.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams