← Search

Emily Louise Hasson

Saint Peters, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 79W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Louise Hasson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe Henze mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Zach Weil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-07 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Traigle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-5
L
2026-04-19 · Henze/Varner (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · Henze/Varner (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Henze/Varner (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Henze/Varner (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Julie Miller / Nancy Brown
2026-02-22 · Henze/Varner (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with TRACY ABERNATHY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · Henze/Varner (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-04 · Jordan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arthur Jordan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-21 · Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Litvin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-03 · Raising A Racquet (Henze) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with ALEX MANERA mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.6%
60W–48L · 51.8% of games
3.5
19%
4W–17L · 38% of games
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 56.4% of games
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
54 matches
#2 Singles
22%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams