← Search

Ginger Kluesner

O Fallon, MO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 36W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ginger Kluesner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-08-16 · 40-Love (Rhoads) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John McGowan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · 40-Love (Rhoads) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Gregerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Rhoads · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Bain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · Rhoads · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Rigby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · 40-Love (Rhoads) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Gregerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Rhoads · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy David
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Rebecca Lewis / Maria BonDurant
2026-03-16 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shashi Pathak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-10 · STL/Rhoads/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Eisenbeis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-09 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte French
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-04 · STL/Rhoads/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Eisenbeis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-02 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Anne Scheidegger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-02-23 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Rhoads
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 58.3% of games
3.0
19.3%
11W–46L · 39.3% of games
6.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer