← Search

Hannah Terry

Belleville, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 20W–17L · seasons 2026–2027

Captains: add Hannah Terry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Bostick (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Briana Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · Release the Quacken (Shouldis) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Terry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-4
W
2026-06-18 · Release the Quacken (Shouldis) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Terry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-04 · Release the Quacken (Shouldis) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Delsignore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · Bostick (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Briana Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Bostick (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Briana Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · Bostick (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Kammann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-4
W
2026-03-29 · Bostick (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Kammann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Schwaegel (S) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-1
L
2026-03-22 · Bostick (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Briana Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-22 · Schwaegel (S) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth E Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 61.9% of games
3.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 35% of the time
#2 Singles
35%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe