← Search

Cody McKee

NEW YORK, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 98W–29L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cody McKee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Martinetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Livaudais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Salvador Mikel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miguel Norena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-19 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-12 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Gregory-Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · with Alex Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-03 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidur Mittal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-05 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Gregory-Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 68.6% of games
4.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 57.9% of games
3.5mixed
65%
13W–7L · 56.8% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.7% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 80.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#1 Male Doubles
11%
14 matches
#1 Singles
9%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert