← Search

Ian Gregory-Davis

Brooklyn, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 55W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ian Gregory-Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-07-07 · Jordan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Ni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-01 · Wong/Liu · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Mesina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Jordan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · Jordan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-08 · Gonzalez · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Gonzalez · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · Wong/Liu · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · Gonzalez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · Wong/Jordan · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
Eugene Shekhtman / Robert Lee
2026-03-29 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidur Mittal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-12 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cody McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-26 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidur Mittal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.9% of games
4.0
73%
46W–17L · 57.5% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#1 Singles
29%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#2 Singles
13%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert