← Search

Amy Armond

CONWAY, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 13W–12L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amy Armond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-04-26 · RMiller/Conway/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Battisto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-21 · RMiller/Conway/CTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robbin Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-31 · RMiller/Conway/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Lamey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-30 · RMiller/Conway/CTC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-05 · OATES/RVILLE/BP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Talley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-21 · Breaker/Stanford/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Swede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5
W
2025-07-16 · Breaker/Stanford/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Orena McClendon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robbin Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-08-13 · STANFORD/OATES/CONWAY/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-06-18 · STANFORD/OATES/CONWAY/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Neumeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-05-16 · Armond/Miller/Conway/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Cope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 51.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal