← Search

Jessica Doose

Little Rock, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 44W–45L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jessica Doose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Gardner/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Doose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · Jones/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stefan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · Gardner/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Keathley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · Gardner/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Stone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-22 · Jones/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stefan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · Gardner/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Keathley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · McPherson/Gray/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Koger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-05 · Watts/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Wayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · McGetrick/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelli Dominick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-22 · McGetrick/LR/OC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelli Dominick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-20 · McPherson/Gray/LR/Rebs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-16 · Watts/NLR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Welker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 66.9% of games
3.0
44.1%
15W–19L · 49.7% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 30.3% of games
5.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 54.6% of games
2.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 60.7% of games
3.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches
#3 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert